How Do You Cheat on ALEKS? Ethics & Consequences

The prevalence of online learning platforms such as ALEKS, developed by McGraw Hill, has introduced new avenues for academic dishonesty, prompting critical examination of methods such as those explored in the query of "how do you cheat on ALEKS." Ethical considerations surrounding academic integrity necessitate a careful analysis of tools and techniques employed to circumvent the system, with consequences ranging from failing grades to expulsion. The very existence of forums and websites dedicated to discussing methods of cheating underscores the challenges faced by educational institutions in upholding standards of conduct and fair assessment. This situation demands a comprehensive understanding of the causes and effects of cheating on ALEKS and similar platforms, as well as strategies for promoting academic honesty among students.

The Rising Tide of Academic Dishonesty in ALEKS

Academic integrity forms the bedrock of higher education, ensuring that learning and assessment are conducted fairly and ethically. It represents a commitment to honesty, trust, respect, fairness, and responsibility in academic work.

These principles safeguard the value of degrees and certifications, fostering a culture of genuine intellectual growth. When academic integrity is compromised, the entire educational system suffers.

ALEKS (Assessment and Learning in Knowledge Spaces) is a widely used, adaptive learning platform designed to personalize the educational experience in mathematics, statistics, chemistry, and accounting. Its strength lies in its ability to identify individual knowledge gaps and provide targeted instruction.

However, the increasing prevalence of academic dishonesty within the ALEKS environment poses a serious threat to its effectiveness and the principles of academic integrity. This necessitates a thorough examination of the scope, causes, and consequences of cheating on this platform.

Defining Academic Integrity

Academic integrity encompasses a multifaceted set of values that promote ethical conduct in all aspects of scholarly work. It includes not only avoiding plagiarism and cheating but also ensuring the accuracy and honesty of research, data collection, and collaborative projects.

Upholding academic integrity is essential for maintaining the credibility of educational institutions and the validity of academic credentials. It ensures that students are evaluated fairly on their own merit and that their achievements reflect genuine learning and understanding.

ALEKS: A Personalized Learning Tool

ALEKS aims to create a customized learning path for each student based on their individual knowledge and skill levels. The platform utilizes adaptive questioning to pinpoint areas where students need the most assistance, providing tailored instruction and practice exercises.

Its effectiveness hinges on students engaging honestly with the material and allowing the system to accurately assess their capabilities. When students circumvent the system through cheating, they undermine the entire personalized learning process.

The Problem of Cheating on ALEKS

Despite its benefits, ALEKS has become susceptible to various forms of academic dishonesty. Students may seek unauthorized assistance from online forums, utilize external problem-solving tools, or even hire others to complete their assessments.

The ease of access to online resources and the pressure to achieve high grades can contribute to this problem. The increasing incidence of cheating on ALEKS raises concerns about the validity of assessments, the fairness of the learning environment, and the overall quality of education.

Scope and Purpose of this Analysis

This analysis aims to comprehensively explore the issue of academic dishonesty within the ALEKS environment. It will delve into the various factors contributing to cheating, the methods employed by students, and the potential consequences for individuals and institutions.

By identifying the key stakeholders involved and examining existing mitigation strategies, this analysis seeks to offer practical recommendations for fostering academic integrity and safeguarding the value of education in the digital age. It serves as a crucial step toward understanding and addressing the rising tide of academic dishonesty within the ALEKS platform.

Who's Involved? Key Stakeholders and Their Responsibilities

The integrity of any educational platform, including ALEKS, is a shared responsibility. A multitude of stakeholders, each with their own roles and influence, contribute to either upholding or undermining academic honesty within the system. Understanding these stakeholders and their responsibilities is crucial for developing effective strategies to combat cheating.

Students: Navigating Motivations and Pressures

Students are at the heart of the educational process, and their choices ultimately determine the level of academic integrity within ALEKS. The motivations behind cheating are complex and multifaceted. They often stem from knowledge gaps, performance anxiety, time constraints, or a perceived lack of support.

Students facing difficulties with the material may resort to cheating as a means of achieving acceptable grades without genuinely mastering the concepts. The pressure to succeed, whether self-imposed or driven by external expectations, can further exacerbate this tendency. It is crucial to acknowledge that cheating is often a symptom of larger issues within the learning environment.

Instructors/Professors: Guardians of the Learning Environment

Instructors play a vital role in fostering a culture of academic integrity and preventing cheating. They are responsible for designing assessments that are both challenging and fair, clearly communicating expectations, and providing adequate support to students. Furthermore, instructors must be vigilant in detecting and addressing instances of academic dishonesty.

This requires a proactive approach, including utilizing the features of ALEKS to monitor student progress, employing a variety of assessment methods, and staying informed about common cheating strategies. Effective communication of academic integrity policies and a willingness to address student concerns can also contribute to a more honest learning environment.

Academic Integrity Officers: Enforcers of Ethical Standards

Academic Integrity Officers serve as the guardians of ethical standards within educational institutions. Their primary responsibility is to investigate allegations of academic misconduct, determine appropriate sanctions, and educate the campus community about academic integrity policies.

Their role is critical in upholding the principles of fairness and accountability. They ensure that students who cheat are held responsible for their actions, while also providing guidance and support to prevent future incidents. The effectiveness of Academic Integrity Officers depends on their ability to conduct thorough investigations, enforce policies consistently, and foster a culture of integrity across the institution.

Cheating Service Providers: Profiteers of Dishonesty

The proliferation of online cheating services represents a significant threat to academic integrity. These providers offer a range of services, including answers to ALEKS problems, assistance with assessments, and even complete course completion.

Their motivations are primarily financial, capitalizing on student anxieties and the desire for quick results. The methods employed by these services vary, but often involve accessing and sharing copyrighted material, impersonating students, and employing individuals with expertise in the subject matter. The ethical implications of these services are profound, as they undermine the value of education and create an unfair playing field for students who choose to learn honestly.

McGraw Hill (ALEKS Publisher): Protecting Platform Integrity

As the publisher of ALEKS, McGraw Hill has a responsibility to ensure the integrity of the platform and to implement measures to prevent cheating. This includes developing robust security features, monitoring for suspicious activity, and working with educational institutions to address instances of academic dishonesty.

McGraw Hill's actions directly impact the effectiveness of ALEKS as a learning tool. They must continuously adapt their security measures to stay ahead of evolving cheating techniques and collaborate with educators to promote best practices for assessment and instruction.

Universities/Colleges: Setting the Tone and Enforcing Policies

Universities and colleges bear the ultimate responsibility for creating a culture of academic integrity and enforcing policies that deter cheating. This involves establishing clear expectations for student conduct, providing comprehensive training for instructors, and supporting the work of Academic Integrity Officers.

The institutional impact of cheating is far-reaching, affecting the reputation of the institution, the value of its degrees, and the overall quality of education. By prioritizing academic integrity and implementing effective policies, universities and colleges can foster a learning environment that promotes honesty, fairness, and intellectual growth.

Cheating Hotspots: Environments and Modalities

Academic dishonesty doesn't occur in a vacuum. Specific environments and modalities are more conducive to cheating than others, creating what we can term "cheating hotspots." Understanding these environments and the mechanisms that facilitate academic dishonesty within them is essential for developing targeted intervention strategies. This section will explore several key hotspots for ALEKS cheating, analyzing how each contributes to the problem.

Online Forums: The Open Exchange of Dishonesty

Online forums, such as Reddit, Chegg, and Discord, have become significant hubs for the exchange of information and methods related to cheating. These platforms offer anonymity and a sense of community, which can embolden students to seek or provide assistance with ALEKS assessments in ways that clearly violate academic integrity.

The Ecology of Cheating Communities

Within these forums, students often share specific ALEKS questions and answers, discuss strategies for circumventing proctoring software, and even offer to complete assessments on behalf of others. The ease of access to this information, coupled with the perception of reduced risk, makes online forums a particularly fertile ground for academic dishonesty. The anonymity provided by these platforms lowers the barrier to entry for students who might otherwise hesitate to cheat.

Forum Features that Facilitate Cheating

The structure of many forums also contributes to the problem. Features such as search functions, categorized threads, and private messaging enable students to quickly locate and share specific information related to ALEKS assessments. Furthermore, the collaborative nature of these forums can create a sense of shared responsibility, further normalizing cheating behavior.

Homes, Dorms, and Remote Testing: The Challenge of Unproctored Assessments

The increasing prevalence of online education has led to a surge in unproctored assessments, particularly in home, dorm, and other remote testing locations. While offering convenience and flexibility, these environments present significant challenges to maintaining academic integrity. The lack of direct supervision makes it easier for students to access unauthorized resources and engage in other forms of cheating.

Vulnerabilities in Remote Testing

In unproctored settings, students can easily access textbooks, notes, the internet, or assistance from others while completing ALEKS assessments. While some institutions employ remote proctoring software, these tools are not foolproof and can be circumvented by determined students. The effectiveness of remote proctoring depends heavily on the sophistication of the software and the diligence of the proctors.

Potential Monitoring Strategies

Despite the challenges, several strategies can be employed to mitigate cheating in remote testing environments. These include: implementing stricter identity verification procedures, using question banks that generate unique assessments for each student, requiring students to show their surroundings via webcam, and employing AI-powered monitoring tools to detect suspicious behavior. However, it is important to balance these measures with concerns about student privacy and accessibility.

Testing Centers and Proctored Labs: Controlled Environments Under Scrutiny

Testing centers and proctored labs are designed to provide a more controlled environment for assessments, aiming to minimize opportunities for cheating. These facilities typically have strict rules regarding permissible materials, electronic devices, and communication with others. However, even in these environments, cheating can still occur, highlighting the limitations of relying solely on physical proctoring.

Limitations of Physical Proctoring

Proctors can be distracted or may not be able to monitor all students effectively at all times. Students may also find ways to conceal unauthorized materials or communicate with others discreetly. The effectiveness of testing centers depends on the vigilance and training of the proctors, as well as the implementation of robust security measures.

The Importance of Multi-Layered Security

To enhance the security of testing centers, institutions should consider implementing a multi-layered approach that includes: video surveillance, strict device policies, regular inspection of testing rooms, and the use of specialized software that restricts access to unauthorized websites and applications. Regular training for proctors on how to identify and address cheating behaviors is also essential.

Websites Offering Solutions: The Commercialization of Academic Dishonesty

The proliferation of websites offering solutions to ALEKS problems and assistance with assessments represents a significant and growing threat to academic integrity. These services, often marketed as "tutoring" or "study aids," provide students with ready-made answers, step-by-step solutions, and even complete assessment completion services. The motivations of these services are primarily financial, exploiting student anxieties and the desire for quick results.

Legal and Ethical Implications

The operation of these websites raises a number of legal and ethical concerns. Many of these services rely on accessing and sharing copyrighted material, which may constitute copyright infringement. Furthermore, the provision of solutions and assessment completion services undermines the value of education and creates an unfair playing field for students who choose to learn honestly. Many universities consider the use of these services as a form of academic misconduct, subject to disciplinary action.

Combating Cheating Services

Addressing the threat posed by cheating services requires a multi-pronged approach that includes: working with law enforcement agencies to shut down illegal websites, educating students about the ethical and academic consequences of using these services, and implementing technological measures to detect and prevent access to these websites during ALEKS assessments. McGraw Hill, as the publisher of ALEKS, also has a responsibility to actively monitor and address the proliferation of these services.

Integrity Under Fire: Concepts and Principles at Risk

Academic dishonesty within platforms like ALEKS strikes at the very foundation of education. It is not merely a violation of rules, but a corrosive force that undermines core principles. These principles include fair assessment, honest knowledge acquisition, and ethical conduct. Understanding the concepts at risk is crucial for formulating effective countermeasures.

The Erosion of Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is the cornerstone of any reputable educational institution. It encompasses honesty, trust, fairness, respect, and responsibility in all academic endeavors. Cheating, in any form, directly contradicts these values. It creates an uneven playing field. This disadvantages students who are committed to learning through legitimate means.

Moreover, widespread academic dishonesty erodes the credibility of the institution itself. This can diminish the value of degrees earned and compromise the public's trust in the educational system.

Defining Cheating in the ALEKS Environment

Cheating within ALEKS can manifest in various forms. These include, but are not limited to:

• Obtaining unauthorized solutions to problems online.
• Having someone else complete assignments or assessments.
• Using unauthorized resources during assessments.
• Collaborating with others in ways that violate academic policies.

The digital nature of ALEKS presents unique challenges in detecting and preventing these behaviors. The accessibility of online resources and the anonymity afforded by the internet can embolden students to engage in academic dishonesty.

The Double-Edged Sword of Proctoring Software

Proctoring software aims to mitigate cheating in online assessments by monitoring students' computer screens, webcams, and microphone activity. While these tools can deter some forms of academic dishonesty, they also raise significant ethical considerations.

Concerns about privacy, data security, and potential bias in algorithmic monitoring must be carefully addressed. Institutions must ensure that proctoring software is implemented transparently and fairly. This minimizes the potential for unwarranted intrusion or discrimination. Furthermore, the effectiveness of proctoring software is not absolute. Technically savvy students may find ways to circumvent these measures.

Knowledge Gaps: The Root of the Problem?

Often, cheating stems from underlying knowledge gaps. Students who struggle to understand the material may resort to academic dishonesty as a means of coping with their perceived inadequacy. Rather than seeking help or addressing their learning deficiencies.

This highlights the importance of providing adequate support and resources to students who are struggling. This includes tutoring services, supplemental instruction, and personalized learning approaches. Addressing knowledge gaps proactively can reduce the temptation to cheat. This helps students to build a solid foundation for future learning.

The Undermining of Learning and Skill Development

Cheating circumvents the intended purpose of education. Education is a process of acquiring knowledge, developing critical thinking skills, and fostering intellectual growth. By cheating, students forgo the opportunity to learn the material and develop the skills they need to succeed in their academic and professional lives.

This not only harms the individual student but also undermines the overall quality of education. It creates a cohort of individuals who lack the necessary knowledge and skills to contribute meaningfully to society.

Ethical Decision-Making: A Crucial Component

Ethical decision-making is a crucial component of academic integrity. Students should be encouraged to reflect on the ethical implications of their actions. They should also consider the impact of cheating on themselves, their peers, and the broader academic community.

Institutions should promote a culture of ethical conduct through education and clear communication of academic integrity policies. Providing opportunities for students to engage in ethical reasoning and decision-making can help them develop the moral compass necessary to resist the temptation to cheat.

The Consequences of Academic Dishonesty

The consequences of cheating can be severe and far-reaching. These can range from failing grades and academic probation to suspension or expulsion from the institution. In addition to academic penalties, cheating can also have long-term repercussions for a student's reputation and career prospects.

Many employers conduct background checks and may be hesitant to hire individuals with a history of academic dishonesty. The potential for these negative consequences should serve as a strong deterrent to cheating.

Assessment: Identifying Issues that Enable Cheating

The assessment process itself can inadvertently contribute to cheating. If assessments are poorly designed, lack relevance to the course material, or are overly reliant on rote memorization, students may be more likely to resort to academic dishonesty. Assessments should be carefully designed to promote critical thinking, problem-solving, and application of knowledge.

Consideration should be given to alternative assessment methods, such as projects, presentations, and open-book exams, which can reduce the temptation to cheat. Regular review and revision of assessment practices can help to minimize opportunities for academic dishonesty.

Weaponry of Deception: Tools and Technologies Employed for Cheating

The digital landscape offers a growing arsenal of tools that can be exploited to undermine academic integrity. In the context of ALEKS, these "weapons of deception" range from seemingly innocuous devices like calculators to sophisticated software designed to circumvent security measures. Understanding how these technologies are employed is crucial for developing effective strategies to protect the integrity of online assessments.

The Calculator Conundrum: More Than Just a Tool

Calculators are standard tools in mathematics and science education. However, their unauthorized use during ALEKS assessments presents a significant challenge. Programmable calculators, in particular, can store formulas, notes, or even entire problem-solving routines.

Students may also utilize calculators on separate devices during assessments where their use is prohibited. Prevention strategies include restricting the use of specific calculator models, integrating virtual calculators within the ALEKS platform, and implementing monitoring systems to detect the use of unauthorized devices.

Smartphones and Tablets: Portals to Unauthorized Resources

Smartphones and tablets provide access to a vast trove of information and communication channels. During ALEKS assessments, these devices can be used to search for answers online, access pre-prepared notes, or communicate with others for assistance.

The small size and portability of these devices make them difficult to detect. Mitigating this risk requires strict enforcement of device policies. Also, enhanced proctoring measures, such as screen monitoring and environment scans, can limit their use.

The Web Browser: Gateway to Cheating Websites

Web browsers are indispensable tools for accessing online resources. However, they also provide a direct pathway to cheating websites, online forums, and solution manuals. A simple search can yield answers to specific ALEKS problems or connect students with individuals willing to provide assistance.

Institutions can implement browser lockdown software that limits access to unauthorized websites during assessments. Instructors should also actively monitor online forums and cheating websites for leaked ALEKS content.

Search Engines: A Double-Edged Sword

Search engines like Google and Bing offer immediate access to a wealth of information. While they can be valuable learning tools, they also enable students to quickly find answers to ALEKS problems, often without engaging in meaningful problem-solving.

Combating this requires designing assessment questions that require higher-order thinking skills rather than simple recall. Encouraging students to use search engines responsibly as a learning tool outside of assessments is also important.

Remote Access Software: Taking Control from Afar

Remote access software, such as TeamViewer and AnyDesk, allows one user to control another user's computer remotely. This technology can be exploited for remote test-taking, where someone else completes the ALEKS assessment on behalf of the student.

This type of cheating is difficult to detect. Implementing robust proctoring measures, including live monitoring and identity verification protocols, is crucial.

Textbook Solutions Manuals: Easy Access to Answers

Textbook solutions manuals provide detailed solutions to problems in textbooks. These manuals are often readily available online, either for purchase or through unauthorized sharing. Students can use these manuals to quickly find answers to ALEKS problems without understanding the underlying concepts.

Instructors should be aware of the availability of solutions manuals and design assessments that go beyond textbook exercises. Implementing randomized problem sets and focusing on conceptual understanding can also mitigate this risk.

Camera Obscura Techniques: The Art of Hidden Surveillance

Camera obscura techniques, involving the use of hidden cameras to record assessment questions and transmit them to someone else for answers, represent a more sophisticated form of cheating. This method can be difficult to detect, as the camera is often concealed.

Thorough environment scans before and during assessments are essential. Employing advanced proctoring technologies that can detect suspicious devices or activity is also recommended.

Exploiting Vulnerabilities within the ALEKS Platform

The ALEKS platform itself may contain vulnerabilities that can be exploited for cheating. These vulnerabilities could include flaws in the assessment algorithms, loopholes in the security protocols, or ways to access unauthorized content.

McGraw Hill, the publisher of ALEKS, has a responsibility to continuously monitor the platform for vulnerabilities and implement security updates. Academic institutions should also report any suspected vulnerabilities to McGraw Hill.

Proctoring Software: A Balancing Act

Proctoring software, such as Respondus Lockdown Browser and ProctorU, aims to deter cheating by monitoring students' computer screens, webcams, and microphone activity. While these tools can be effective, they also have limitations. Technically savvy students may find ways to circumvent these measures.

Furthermore, concerns about privacy and data security must be carefully addressed. Institutions should carefully evaluate the effectiveness and ethical implications of proctoring software before implementation.

Equation Solvers: Instant Solutions at a Price

Equation solvers are software programs or online tools that can solve mathematical equations automatically. Students can use these tools to quickly find answers to ALEKS problems without understanding the problem-solving process. Many of these solvers are available as apps on smartphones or as browser extensions, making them easily accessible during assessments.

To counter this, instructors can design assessments that require students to show their work and explain their reasoning. This discourages the use of equation solvers and promotes deeper understanding of the underlying mathematical concepts.

Fighting Back: Mitigation Strategies and Recommendations

Combating academic dishonesty in ALEKS requires a multifaceted approach, moving beyond simple detection to proactive prevention. The following recommendations aim to create a more resilient learning environment where integrity is both valued and actively cultivated. These strategies are not isolated solutions but rather interconnected components of a comprehensive system.

Enhancing Assessment Design: Preventing Cheating Through Innovation

The design of assessments plays a crucial role in either facilitating or deterring cheating. Traditional question formats often lend themselves to easy online searches or solutions found in readily available manuals. Rethinking the assessment approach is essential.

Randomized Problem Sets and Algorithmic Variations

Implementing randomized problem sets ensures that each student receives a unique set of questions. Algorithmic variations can further modify the numerical values or specific parameters within each problem, making it difficult to share solutions.

Emphasis on Conceptual Understanding and Application

Assessments should shift from rote memorization to the application of knowledge. Design questions that require students to explain their reasoning, justify their answers, or apply concepts to novel scenarios.

Integration of Open-Ended Questions and Problem-Solving Steps

Incorporate open-ended questions that require students to demonstrate their problem-solving process. Requiring students to show their work and explain their reasoning discourages reliance on external solvers.

Adaptive Testing and Personalized Learning Paths

Leverage the adaptive nature of ALEKS to create personalized learning paths. Assessments should be tailored to each student's individual progress and understanding, making it more challenging to find prefabricated solutions.

Strengthening Proctoring Measures: Striking a Balance Between Security and Privacy

Proctoring measures aim to monitor student activity during assessments and deter cheating. However, it's crucial to strike a balance between security and privacy, ensuring that proctoring methods are effective without being overly intrusive or violating student rights.

Live Proctoring with Trained Monitors

Live proctoring, where trained monitors observe students in real-time, can be an effective deterrent. Monitors can identify suspicious behavior and intervene when necessary.

Automated Proctoring Technologies: Capabilities and Limitations

Automated proctoring technologies, such as screen recording and webcam monitoring, can provide a scalable solution. However, it's important to acknowledge their limitations. Technically savvy students may find ways to circumvent these measures.

Environment Scans and Identity Verification Protocols

Prior to the assessment, require students to perform environment scans to ensure that they are working in a secure location. Implement robust identity verification protocols to prevent impersonation.

Addressing Privacy Concerns and Data Security

Transparency is paramount when implementing proctoring measures. Clearly communicate to students how their data will be collected, used, and stored. Ensure that all proctoring activities comply with relevant privacy regulations.

Promoting Academic Integrity Education: Cultivating Ethical Values

The most sustainable approach to combating cheating involves instilling a strong sense of academic integrity in students. Education programs can play a vital role in promoting ethical behavior and fostering a culture of honesty.

Comprehensive Workshops on Academic Integrity

Offer comprehensive workshops that cover the principles of academic integrity, the different forms of academic dishonesty, and the consequences of cheating. These workshops should emphasize the importance of honesty, fairness, and accountability.

Integrating Ethics Discussions into Course Curricula

Integrate discussions about ethics and academic integrity into course curricula. Encourage students to reflect on their own values and consider the ethical implications of their actions.

Clear and Accessible Academic Integrity Policies

Ensure that academic integrity policies are clear, concise, and easily accessible to students. The consequences of cheating should be clearly defined and consistently enforced.

Encouraging a Culture of Peer Accountability

Foster a culture of peer accountability, where students feel empowered to report instances of cheating. Create a safe and supportive environment where students can raise concerns without fear of retaliation.

Leveraging Technology for Detection: Identifying Patterns and Anomalies

Data analytics and machine learning can be used to identify cheating patterns and anomalies. By analyzing student performance data, institutions can detect suspicious activity and intervene when necessary.

Analyzing Assessment Performance Data

Analyze assessment performance data to identify unusual patterns, such as sudden improvements in scores or statistically improbable answer sequences. These patterns may indicate cheating.

Monitoring Online Forums and Cheating Websites

Actively monitor online forums and cheating websites for leaked ALEKS content or discussions about cheating methods. This information can be used to identify potential cheating incidents and develop preventative measures.

Developing Algorithms to Detect Suspicious Activity

Develop algorithms to detect suspicious activity, such as the use of unauthorized software or the exchange of answers during assessments. These algorithms can flag potential cheating incidents for further investigation.

Utilizing Plagiarism Detection Software for Open-Ended Responses

For open-ended questions, utilize plagiarism detection software to identify instances of copying or paraphrasing from external sources. This helps ensure that students are submitting original work.

Collaborating with Stakeholders: Building a United Front

Combating academic dishonesty requires a collaborative effort involving all stakeholders, including students, instructors, academic integrity officers, and McGraw Hill (the publisher of ALEKS). Open communication and shared responsibility are essential for creating a culture of academic integrity.

Establishing a Cross-Functional Academic Integrity Committee

Establish a cross-functional academic integrity committee that includes representatives from all stakeholder groups. This committee can develop and implement strategies to promote academic integrity and address instances of cheating.

Regular Communication and Information Sharing

Foster regular communication and information sharing among stakeholders. This includes sharing best practices, reporting suspected cheating incidents, and collaborating on preventative measures.

Providing Training and Support for Instructors

Provide training and support for instructors on how to detect and prevent cheating. Equip instructors with the tools and resources they need to create a culture of academic integrity in their classrooms.

Working with McGraw Hill to Enhance Platform Security

Work with McGraw Hill to enhance the security of the ALEKS platform. This includes reporting vulnerabilities, suggesting improvements to assessment design, and collaborating on the development of anti-cheating measures.

So, while the temptation to figure out how do you cheat on ALEKS might be strong, remember that the fleeting relief of a shortcut just isn't worth the potential consequences. Put in the work, learn the material, and you'll not only pass the course honestly but also build a foundation for future success. Good luck with your studies!